![]() |
||
|
A
newsletter from the Entomology, Horticulture, and Plant Pathology Departments,
Volume
23, Number 19 In this issue::
ENTOMOLOGY
PA
APPLE MARKETING BOARD SMALL
FRUITS OTHER ENTOMOLOGY WINTER WORKSHOP ON NEW APPROACHES TO CONTROL INTERNAL FRUIT FEEDERS: Please mark your calendar for the 3rd bi-annual Pennsylvania State University workshop on monitoring and managing of internal fruit feeders (Oriental fruit moth and codling moth) to be held on March 02, 2005 in Gettysburg, PA. The PSU fruit entomology specialists together with guest speakers from Rutgers University and Michigan State University will discuss in depth the newest aspects of managing internal fruit feeders including the most current research conducted during last few seasons (i.e., mating disruption, pesticide resistance, new pesticides). The workshop will be open to growers, consultants and industry representatives from PA and other Mid-Atlantic States. The details of the program and registration forms will be distributed during the 2005 Mid-Atlantic Fruit and Vegetable Convention in Hershey, PA, during winter PA meetings and through the fruit industry media (i.e., Fruit Times Newsletter, Pennsylvania Fruit News). The deadline for registrations is February 14, 2005. The registration form will be also posted at the PSU FREC web site at: http://frec.cas.psu.edu/ If you need more information please contact Dr. Greg Krawczyk at PSU FREC: phone (717) 677-6116 ext.5 or e-mail gxk13@psu.edu.
Submitted below is the full text of carbaryl IRED Notice of availability: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number OPP-2003-0376, must be received on or before December 27, 2004. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Britten, Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8179; fax number: (703) 308-8005; e-mail address: britten.anthony@epa.gov . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: B. How Can I Get Copies
of this Document and Other Related Information? 2. Electronic access. You
may access this Federal Register document electronically through the
EPA Internet under the "Federal Register" listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/
. Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff. C. How and to Whom Do
I Submit Comments? 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
2. By mail. Send your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2003-0376. 3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2003-0376. Such deliveries are only accepted during the docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1. D. How Should I Submit
CBI to the Agency? E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
II. Background A. What Action is the Agency Taking? Under section 4 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is reevaluating existing pesticides to ensure that they meet current scientific and regulatory standards. EPA completed an IRED for the N-methyl carbamate pesticide carbaryl on June 30, 2003, and is now issuing this document for public comment. Carbaryl is an insecticide registered for use on agricultural crops, sod, and for residential use on pets and in homes and gardens. Carbaryl is also used by USDA for grasshopper control. The Carbaryl IRED presents the Agency's conclusions on the risks posed by exposure to carbaryl alone; however, section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) directs the Agency also to consider available information on the cumulative risk from substances sharing a common mechanism of toxicity. Because the N-methyl carbamate pesticides share a common mechanism of toxicity, cholinesterase inhibition, the Agency will evaluate the cumulative risk posed by this group before making final reregistration eligibility decisions on individual N-methyl carbamates. During the pendency of the carbamate cumulative assessment, the Agency is proceeding with risk assessments and interim risk management for individual carbamate pesticides. EPA has determined that, but for the cumulative risk assessment, the data base to support carbaryl reregistration is substantially complete and that products containing carbaryl will be eligible for reregistration, provided the risks are mitigated in the manner described in the IRED. Upon submission of any required product specific data under section 4(g)(2)(B) of FIFRA and any necessary changes to the registration and labeling (either to address concerns identified in the IRED or as a result of product specific data), and after assessing N-methyl carbamate cumulative risks, EPA will make a final reregistration decision under section 4(g)(2)(C) of FIFRA for products containing carbaryl. When the Agency finalizes decisions for carbaryl and other N-methyl carbamate pesticides, further risk mitigation may be required for carbaryl. Although the Carbaryl IRED was signed on June 30, 2003, certain components of the document, which did not affect the final regulatory decision, were undergoing final editing at that time. These components, including the list of additional generic data requirements, summary of labeling changes, appendices, and other relevant information, have been added to the Carbaryl IRED document. In addition, subsequent to signature, EPA identified several minor errors and ambiguities in the document. Therefore, for the sake of accuracy, EPA also has included the appropriate error corrections, amendments, and clarifications. All of these changes are described in detail in an errata memorandum which is included in the public docket for carbaryl. Following signature of the IRED, EPA received new pharmacokinetic data from BayerCrop Science to refine the risk estimates from residential lawn broadcast applications of carbaryl liquid formulations. They also submitted a proposed method for using the data in a deterministic calculation of the risks. EPA is planning to seek independent scientific review of this information through a Scientific Advisory Panel meeting in December 2004. The new data and EPA's preliminary review of the data are included in the docket also. The reregistration program is being conducted under Congressionally mandated time frames, and EPA recognizes the need both to make timely reregistration decisions and to involve the public in finding ways to effectively mitigate pesticide risks. Through the Agency's public participation process, EPA worked extensively with stakeholders and the public to reach the regulatory decisions for carbaryl. The Agency is issuing the carbaryl IRED for public comment. The comment period is intended to provide an additional opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating any necessary amendments to the IRED. All comments should be submitted using the methods in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, and must be received by EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will become part of the Agency docket for carbaryl. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked "late." EPA is not required to consider these late comments. The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the closing date. If any comment significantly affects the document, EPA will publish an amendment to the IRED in the Federal Register. In the absence of substantive comments requiring changes, the risk management decisions reflected in the carbaryl IRED will be implemented without further notice. These decisions may be supplemented by further risk mitigation measures when EPA considers its cumulative assessment of the N-methyl carbamate pesticides. B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action? Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA, as amended in 1988 and 1996, directs that, after submission of all data concerning a pesticide active ingredient, "the Administrator shall determine whether pesticides containing such active ingredient are eligible for reregistration," before calling in product specific data on individual end-use products and either reregistering products or taking other "appropriate regulatory action." Section 408(q) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(q), requires EPA to review tolerances and exemptions for pesticide residues in effect as of August 2, 1996, to determine whether the tolerance or exemption meets the requirements of section 408(b)(2) or (c)(2) of FFDCA. This review is to be completed by August 3, 2006. List of Subjects Dated: October 21, 2004. PA
APPLE MARKETING BOARD 11/20 Sales Deadline for Fruit: Apple, Grape and Peach producers are reminded that this deadline affects new enrollments for protection or to make coverage changes to current policies for next year. Remember to that if programs are not approved for a certain county, protection may be available by a written agreement filed by 11/20 (requires a minimum of 3 years of individual production records). 11/30 Sales Deadline for GRP Forage Production: Producers have the option to insure forage production against widespread loss of product to the extent that the NASS\USDA county average yields fluctuate. Illustration: If producer insured at $400 per acre at 90% level of coverage and the county yield is only 80% of the normal, producer would be paid $40 per acre. This coverage requires minimal record keeping and can cover all classes of hay including rotational grazing. Coverage is available for acreage located in 29 PA counties of Adams, Armstrong, Bedford, Berks, Bradford, Butler, Centre, Chester, Clarion, Crawford, Cumberland, Erie, Fayette, Franklin, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Jefferson, Lancaster, Lycoming, Mercer, Perry, Somerset, Susquehanna, Tioga, Washington, Wayne, Westmoreland, and York. Reminder to Report Notice of Damage or Loss: The policy requires notice within 72 hours of discovery of damage, before the destruction of the crop and within 15 days after the earlier of harvesting completion (by crop by farm unit) or the end of insurance period (12/10 for corn and soybeans). The purpose is to give a loss adjuster the opportunity to help producers document the yield, quality and causes of loss to support a claim. Remember too that with CRC (Crop Revenue Coverage) a loss payment can result with a near normal yield because of the decline in fall prices (see illustration in RAM). IF IN DOUBT - FILE NOTICE! CONTACT A CROP INSURANCE
AGENT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE ABOVE ITEMS. EASTERN APPLES: When I want to get a great marketing conversation going out in the field, this phrase will do it for me every time. The grower/ packer/shipper responses to this phrase have ranged from "Way to go, Idaho!" to "No way, you're dead wrong on this." Since the Eastern Apples marketing tactic defines all of our promotions this season, I thought it might be appropriate to expound on the logic behind using this as part of our identity. Currently, if you ask an average consumer where apples are grown in this country, the response is almost always, "Washington." Apple marketers have known for a long time that Washington State owns the apple category in the produce department. In fact, we question why they continued for so long to spend funds "buying" a category they already owned when the funds would have been better spent promoting the category and increasing overall apple consumption in this country. Nonetheless, the average consumer is "unaware" that apples also come from the east, and that they usually taste much better from this region of the country. Part of helping the consumer identify our apples is to establish the entire collection of eastern states as an apple-growing region. Using the word "Eastern" becomes critical, because by default, Eastern is the opposite of Western, and Eastern is anything that is not Western. In essence, what we're doing is using Washington's money and effort spent over the last couple of decades to establish our own identity almost free of charge, and within just a few years. If the consumer already recognizes "Western", then by default, the existence of "Eastern" is assumed, and logical. We just have to bring it to the surface. Thank you, Washington. But the picture is even bigger than the one prescribed by the consumer when you look at the retailer. With the onslaught of technology and globalization came the need to consolidate for the sake of efficiency and cost effectiveness. Smaller retailers have been gobbled up by larger global conglomerates with millions of dollars to spend on software that allows them to purchase electronically, based on a demand that is tracked (you guessed it) electronically. But this technology is expensive, and few suppliers can afford to buy into the system. Nonetheless, many retailers require it before a supplier can be awarded a contract. For them, there are fewer suppliers involved, response time goes up, and cost goes down. As a result, the very stressed supplier now has a more secure relationship with the happy retailer. Not coincidentally, this software identifies Washington as one supplier category, and everyone else as another supplier category. So without any effort on our part, we are, in the eyes of the retailer, Eastern Apples, whether we agree and comply or not. Finally, we have to affect consumer attitude so they actually pick up the apples and purchase them. How do marketers affect attitude? Do you know what the milk moustache is? Can you name the other white meat? How did the egg, which is rich in cholesterol, become the friend of the low-carb dieter? Marketers change the attitudes of the public by appealing to their emotions. Milk is cool, pork is healthy, and eggs are smart. What are apples? Nutritious and local. And the message is working. Our first promotion this year was themed, "What Can An Apple Do For You?" and it touted a list of eleven health and nutrition facts about apples. The second one was "Healthy To The Core" where elegant apple slices stood sentry around a perfect core. Where else could you buy apple slices this year? McDonald's. And why were they selling apple slices? Because apple slices are more nutritious than fries. The message was not lost on our consumers. One retailer I spoke with told me that of all the hits the produce department has taken over the last year from the low-carb message, the apple was the singular product that withstood the attack. Why? Because apples are the icon for healthy living, and consumers were not willing to give up common sense and what they knew to be true for the low-carb message. Yes, apple eaters have great attitudes, so how do we make the Eastern Apples message appeal to their emotions? If you lived on the east coast, and you had a choice between an apple that was shipped all the way across the country and one that grew in the next state, which one seems fresher? The consumer believes that the local apple is fresher. Also, if you knew you were buying an apple that was grown on the east coast, how would you feel about your money staying within your economy? Consumers are willing to accept that an apple grown within a few states of their hometown is a local apple. They believe it's fresher, and they believe it's helping a local grower. Our Eastern Apples message is, "Grown in an orchard near you." And an apple that is fresher certainly must have more nutritive value, right? This year, with this more generic approach to marketing, we doubled the retail demand for our point of sale materials. Bi-Lo, Wegman's, SuperValu East, Tops, and Wal-Mart, retailers who previously didn't have much interest in our state material, requested it this year because it fit their system and because the message was generic enough that it didn't limit their in-department promotions. Before when our logo was included in an ad, it usually sat right next to the Washington state logo. Now, our logo gets full position alone in these ads. Prior to the introduction of the Eastern Apples logo, the consumer would pick up a bag of apples with the company brand on it and search to figure out where the apples came from. Now, when the consumer enters the grocery store, they see the private brand labeled on one side of a bag of apples, and Eastern Apples proudly labeled on the other side. There's no doubt about where that apple came from, and you can take pride in that. Each of you has worked
hard to establish your identities within the apple industry. No one
would ask you to sacrifice that for the sake of a different identity.
But perhaps that identity can be enhanced by helping the retailer
and the consumer identify where your apples are from. Just as a Regal
is a Buick or a Kenmore is from Sears, perhaps your brand can be an
Eastern Apple. For samples of our point-of-sale materials, call contact
us at (717) 783-5418, or c-daguilar@state.pa.us. SMALL FRUITS THE ORGANIC WAY - PREVENTATIVE DISEASE MANAGEMENT FOR HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRIES: The first step in preventative management of blueberry diseases is to become familiarized with the diseases that blueberry plants are susceptible to as well as the environmental factors that favor disease development. Management strategies can then be developed specifically for individual farms or fields within a farm. Selecting disease free sites and planting stock are first steps in preventative disease management. The primary symptoms of several diseases caused by fungi are described below along with preventative strategies for disease management.
Disease Symptoms:
Symptoms first appear on 1-year-old twigs with flower buds at bud break.
Infected twigs may die back or suddenly wilt. Infected stems may have
reddish-brown lesions that are about 1 to 4 inches long. Brownish cankers
4 to 8 inches long may be observed initially during in the summer on
1-, 2- or 3-year-old canes and can result in the death of the entire
canes. Reddish-brown, brittle, dead leaves will persist on dead canes.
Development of this disease is favored by wet weather, especially in
the early part of the growing season. Infective spores are spread by
splashing rain.
Preventative Management Strategies: Plant resistant and/or tolerant cultivars. 'Bluetta' is a cultivar with resistance and 'Coville', 'Earliblue', 'Elliott', 'Nelson' and 'Rancocas' have tolerance. Remove infected canes to promote drying of the plant canopy. This also serves to remove possible sources of inoculum and therefore slow spread of the disease. Use irrigation and fertilization management that promote early hardening off (don't irrigate or fertilize too late in season) of the blueberry plants.
Disease Symptoms: Early symptoms of this disease include yellowing or reddening then dying of the leaves of one or more canes of 1- to 2-year-old plants. This will be followed by the death of infected branches with reddish-brown, brittle, necrotic leaves persisting. It is common to observe infected canes along side of seemingly healthy canes. Cutting a stem, with healthy and infected tissue, length-wise will reveal brown discoloration of the infected tissue while the healthy portion of the stem will have white or cream colored tissue. Plants can become infected anytime throughout the growing season. Development of this disease is favored by wet weather, especially in late spring. Infective spores are spread by wind. Preventative Management Strategies: Remove infected plants to eliminate possible sources of inoculum and therefore further spread of the disease. Use good sanitation (clean tools and equipment) to avoid spreading the disease.
Disease Symptoms: In the fall, initial symptoms of this disease are tiny water-soaked lesions, on the lower third of 1- or 2-year-old canes, which turn red by December. The following spring and summer the lesions develop into cankers resembling a target. Each canker is generally centered on a leaf scar. During the summer, generally when fruit are present, leaves on stems with cankers will wilt, die and persist on the stem. Canes can be re-infected throughout the growing season. Disease development is favored by wet conditions. Preventative Management Strategies: Plant cultivars with tolerance or resistance to this disease. For example, 'Rancocas' has resistance and 'Berkeley', 'Burlington' and 'Rubel' have tolerance. Prune out infected stems to promote good air circulation within the plant canopy and also to remove inoculum for further spread of the disease. Other methods that promote good air circulation within the planting include proper pruning and good weed management.
Disease Symptoms: Leaves of plants diseased with Phytophthora will yellow, turn red-brown, die and persist on the plant. Infected plants will stop producing new growth. Plants can die rapidly when conditions favoring disease development exist. This disease is caused by a soil borne, which requires free water for the spread of infective spores. Preventative Management Strategies: Select a site with good drainage and avoid planting in low spots in the field to prevent soil water logging and the spread of this disease. Use good moisture management (for example, do not irrigate while it is raining) also to avoid spread of the disease.
Disease Symptoms: Botrytis blight can affect flowers, leaves, twigs and fruit. Generally the flowers are infected first. Infected flowers turn brownish in color and can be covered with gray mycelium that can have black spores. Leaves may become infected next, developing brown necrotic lesions. Ripening fruit can also be diseased with Botrytis Blight and can be identified by gray mycelium and spores growing on the fruit. Cool temperatures and high relative humidity favor disease development. Preventative Management Strategies: Avoid using excess fertilizer in the spring because it stimulates excess growth of susceptible young tissues. Promote good air circulation within the planting to encourage low relative humidity within the plant canopy. For example, use good pruning techniques, weed management and plant spacing.
Disease Symptoms: In the early spring, leaves and young shoots infected with the fungus causing Mummy Berry droop, turn brown and die. Diseased fruit will shrivel or mummify turning from blue to tan in color. The fruit may also emit an odor similar to fermented dark tea. The berries that are mummified will fall off of the plant. The following spring the fungus causing Mummy Berry will produce cup-like spore-bearing structures called apothecia from the mummified berries on the ground. Preventative Management Strategies: Plant cultivars having resistance or tolerance. 'Bluejay', 'Burlington', 'Darrow', 'Duke', 'Elliott', 'Lateblue', 'Northblue' and 'Northsky' have resistance to Mummy Berry and 'Bluecrop', 'Bluetta', 'Collins', 'Coville', 'Rancocas' and 'Spartan' have tolerance. Remove old berries from the plant and fallen leaves and berries from the planting because they can be infected and spread infective spores. Another option is to cover old berries on the ground with 2 inches of soil or mulch before flowering to prevent infective spores from being spread.
Disease Symptoms: Leaves will develop circular to irregular light brown to tan spots with a reddish border. Infection by the fungus that causes Alternaria Fruit Rot begins at the blossom end of the fruit. As the fruit ripen, black spores can be seen and the fruit will become watery or leaky. Disease development is favored by cool, wet weather in the spring. Preventative Management Strategies: Promote good air circulation within the planting to encourage drying within the plant canopy. For example, use good pruning techniques, weed management and plant spacing. Cool berries immediately after harvesting to preserves fruit quality. Use good sanitation (clean tools and equipment) to avoid spreading the disease. Adjust harvesting schedules to avoid over ripe fruit on the plants that favors disease development.
Disease Symptoms: Signs and symptoms of Anthracnose are found primarily on the flowers and fruit. Infected flowers turn brownish to blackish in color. As the fruit ripen, sunken spots at the blossom end may develop. White to light pink mycelia may also be present. Disease development is favored by high moisture in the plant canopy. Preventative Management
Strategies: Plant cultivars with resistance, including 'Elliott' and
'Little Giant'. Promote good air circulation within the planting to
encourage drying within the plant canopy. For example, use good pruning
techniques, weed management and plant spacing. OTHER PRUNING DEMONSTRATION FOR FRUIT GROWERS AND EMPLOYEES: The Bream and Kuhn families will host a fruit tree pruning demonstration on Basic Pruning Principles and New Strategies to Improve Fruit Quality in High-Density Plantings, Thursday, December 16th, 1:00 to 3:30 PM. Dr. Jim Schupp will lead the program, and Bruce Hollabaugh has kindly agreed to interpret the presentation into Spanish. There is no pre-registration
or fee. Participants should meet at Bream Orchards packinghouse on
170 Bingaman Rd., Orrtanna. From Rt. 30, turn at Adams County National
Bank/Franklin Township Office onto High St. Go .7 mile, then left
onto Old Rt. 30, then an immediate right onto Orrtanna Rd. Go 1.1
mile to Bingaman Rd., and turn right.
Thursday, December 16,
2004 1:00 - 3:30 PM Wednesday, January 19,
2005 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM February 1-3, 2005 February 5-9, 2005 Monday, February 21,
2005 8:00 AM - 3:00 PM Tuesday, February 22,
2005 8:00 AM - 3:00 PM Wednesday, February
23, 2005 8:00 AM - 3:00 PM Wednesday, March 2,
2005 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM
Those interested in attending
this event should pre-register by contacting Tara Baugher, tab36@psu.edu
or Matt Harsh, rmh27@psu.edu; 717-334-6271,
Penn State Cooperative Extension in Adams County, 670 Old Harrisburg
Rd., Ste. 204, Gettysburg, PA 17325. The tour group will leave from
the Adams County Agricultural and Natural Resources Center parking
lot at 7:45 AM and return at 4:00 PM. Transportation and lunch will
be provided (with a minimal charge to cover lunch expenses).
Contact
information:
HORTICULTURE:
PLANT PATHOLOGY:
Grzegorz
(Greg) Krawczyk, FTN Coordinator Fruit Times Home | Fruit Pathology | Entomology | Horticulture | Fruit Research & Extension Center Copyright Information This publication is available in alternative media on request. Penn State is committed to affirmative action, equal opportunity, and the diversity of its workforce. This site is a product of Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences. Please contact us with technical questions, comments or suggestions about this website. Last modified on Thursday, July 8, 2004 |